Re: [PATCH 11/14] kconfig: test: check .config sanity for choice values with unmet dep

[Ulf Magnusson]

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:34 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I fixed a problem where "# CONFIG_..." for choice values are wrongly
> written into the .config file when they are once visible, then become
> invisible later.
>
> Add a test for this subtle case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
>  scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/Kconfig     | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/__init__.py | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/config      |  1 +
>  .../kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/expected_config |  5 +++++
>  4 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/Kconfig
>  create mode 100644 scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/__init__.py
>  create mode 100644 scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/config
>  create mode 100644 scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/expected_config
>
> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/Kconfig b/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c00b8fe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +config A
> +       bool "A"
> +
> +choice
> +       prompt "Choice ?"
> +       depends on A
> +
> +config CHOICE_B
> +       bool "Choice B"
> +
> +config CHOICE_C
> +       bool "Choice C"
> +
> +endchoice
> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/__init__.py b/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/__init__.py
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d096622
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/__init__.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +"""
> +Do not write choice values to .config if the dependency is unmet
> +================================================================
> +
> +"# CONFIG_... is not set" should not be written into the .config file
> +for symbols with unmet dependency.
> +
> +This was not working correctly for choice values because choice needs
> +a bit different symbol computation.
> +
> +This checks that no unneeded "# COFIG_... is not set" is contained in
> +the .config file.
> +"""
> +
> +def test(conf):
> +    assert conf.oldaskconfig('config', 'n') == 0
> +    assert conf.config_matches('expected_config')
> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/config b/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/config
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..abd280e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/config
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +CONFIG_A=y
> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/expected_config b/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/expected_config
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0d15e41
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/tests/no_write_if_dep_unmet/expected_config
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +#
> +# Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.
> +# Linux Kernel Configuration
> +#
> +# CONFIG_A is not set
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>

This indirectly tests that choices specified without a type get the
type of the first choice value specified with a type too.

Cheers,
Ulf