Re: [PATCH 03/18] tracing: Add simple arguments to function based events

[Namhyung Kim]

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 06:05:01PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The function based events can now have arguments passed in. A weak function
> arch_get_func_args() is created so that archs can fill in the arguments
> based on pt_regs. Currently no arch implements this function, so no
> arguments are returned. Passing NULL for pt_regs into this function returns
> the number of supported args that can be processed, and the format will
> only allow the user to add valid args. Which currently are all arguments
> until an arch implements the arg_get_func_args() function.
> 
> [ missing 'static' found by Fengguang Wu's kbuild test robot ]
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

[SNIP]
> @@ -129,9 +284,14 @@ static void func_event_trace(struct trace_event_file *trace_file,
>  	struct trace_event_call *call = &func_event->call;
>  	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
>  	struct ring_buffer *buffer;
> +	struct func_arg *arg;
> +	long args[func_event->arg_cnt];
> +	long long val = 1;
>  	unsigned long irq_flags;
> +	int nr_args;
>  	int size;
>  	int pc;
> +	int i = 0;
>  
>  	if (trace_trigger_soft_disabled(trace_file))
>  		return;
> @@ -139,7 +299,7 @@ static void func_event_trace(struct trace_event_file *trace_file,
>  	local_save_flags(irq_flags);
>  	pc = preempt_count();
>  
> -	size = sizeof(*entry);
> +	size = func_event->arg_offset + sizeof(*entry);
>  
>  	event = trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve(&buffer, trace_file,
>  						call->event.type,
> @@ -150,6 +310,15 @@ static void func_event_trace(struct trace_event_file *trace_file,
>  	entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
>  	entry->ip = ip;
>  	entry->parent_ip = parent_ip;
> +	nr_args = arch_get_func_args(pt_regs, 0, func_event->arg_cnt, args);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(arg, &func_event->args, list) {
> +		if (i < nr_args)
> +			val = args[i];
> +		else
> +			val = 0;
> +		memcpy(&entry->data[arg->offset], &val, arg->size);
> +	}

Where is the 'i' increased?

Thanks,
Namhyung