[PATCH 4.14 11/22] Revert "defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()"

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>


[ Upstream commit edbe69ef2c90fc86998a74b08319a01c508bd497 ]

This patch effectively reverts commit 9f1c2674b328 ("net: memcontrol:
defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()").

Moving mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() to the inet_csk_accept() completely breaks
memcg socket memory accounting, as packets received before memcg
pointer initialization are not accounted and are causing refcounting
underflow on socket release.

Actually the free-after-use problem was fixed by
commit c0576e397508 ("net: call cgroup_sk_alloc() earlier in
sk_clone_lock()") for the cgroup pointer.

So, let's revert it and call mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() just before
cgroup_sk_alloc(). This is safe, as we hold a reference to the socket
we're cloning, and it holds a reference to the memcg.

Also, let's drop BUG_ON(mem_cgroup_is_root()) check from
mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(). I see no reasons why bumping the root
memcg counter is a good reason to panic, and there are no realistic
ways to hit it.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c                 |   14 ++++++++++++++
 net/core/sock.c                 |    5 +----
 net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c |    1 -
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5828,6 +5828,20 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk
 	if (!mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
 		return;
 
+	/*
+	 * Socket cloning can throw us here with sk_memcg already
+	 * filled. It won't however, necessarily happen from
+	 * process context. So the test for root memcg given
+	 * the current task's memcg won't help us in this case.
+	 *
+	 * Respecting the original socket's memcg is a better
+	 * decision in this case.
+	 */
+	if (sk->sk_memcg) {
+		css_get(&sk->sk_memcg->css);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(current);
 	if (memcg == root_mem_cgroup)
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1677,16 +1677,13 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct
 		newsk->sk_dst_pending_confirm = 0;
 		newsk->sk_wmem_queued	= 0;
 		newsk->sk_forward_alloc = 0;
-
-		/* sk->sk_memcg will be populated at accept() time */
-		newsk->sk_memcg = NULL;
-
 		atomic_set(&newsk->sk_drops, 0);
 		newsk->sk_send_head	= NULL;
 		newsk->sk_userlocks	= sk->sk_userlocks & ~SOCK_BINDPORT_LOCK;
 		atomic_set(&newsk->sk_zckey, 0);
 
 		sock_reset_flag(newsk, SOCK_DONE);
+		mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk);
 		cgroup_sk_alloc(&newsk->sk_cgrp_data);
 
 		rcu_read_lock();
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -475,7 +475,6 @@ struct sock *inet_csk_accept(struct sock
 		}
 		spin_unlock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock);
 	}
-	mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk);
 out:
 	release_sock(sk);
 	if (req)