[PATCH 4.9 68/92] x86/spectre: Fix spelling mistake: "vunerable"-> "vulnerable"

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


(cherry picked from commit e698dcdfcda41efd0984de539767b4cddd235f1e)

Trivial fix to spelling mistake in pr_err error message text.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180130193218.9271-1-colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ bool retpoline_module_ok(bool has_retpol
 	if (spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_NONE || has_retpoline)
 		return true;
 
-	pr_err("System may be vunerable to spectre v2\n");
+	pr_err("System may be vulnerable to spectre v2\n");
 	spectre_v2_bad_module = true;
 	return false;
 }