Re: [PATCH 6/6] Documentation for Pmalloc

[Igor Stoppa]

On 04/02/18 23:37, Randy Dunlap wrote:

[...]

>> +reason, could neither be declared as constant, nor it could take advantage
> 
>                                                   nor could it

ok

[...]

>> +Ex: A policy that is loaded from userspace.
> 
> Either
>    Example:
> or
>    E.g.:
> (meaning For example)

ok

[...]

>> +Different kernel idrivers and threads can use different pools, for finer
> 
>                     drivers

:-( ok

[...]

>> +  in use anymore by the requestor, however it will not become avaiable for
> 
>                            requester; however,                   available

ok

[...]

>> +- pmalloc does not provide locking support wrt allocating vs protecting
> 
> Write out "wrt" -> with respect to.

ok

>> +  an individual pool, for performance reason. It is recommended to not
> 
>                                          reasons.                  not to

ok & ok

[...]

>> +  in the case of using directly vmalloc. The exact number depends on size
> 
>                  of using vmalloc directly.                          on the size

ok & ok

[...]

>> +6. write protect the pool
> 
>       write-protect

ok

[...]

>> +7. use in read-only mode the handlers obtained through the allocations
> 
>                                 handles ??

yes

---
thanks, igor