Re: [PATCH 14/21] regulator: s5m8767: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO number
From: Lee Jones
Date: Mon Feb 12 2018 - 09:59:23 EST
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Instead of passing a global GPIO number for the enable GPIO, pass
> a descriptor looked up from the device tree node for the
> regulator.
>
> This regulator supports passing platform data, but enable/sleep
> regulators are looked up from the device tree exclusively, so
> we can need not touch other files.
>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Lee: would be nice if you could ACK this smallish patch to
> the MFD header.
Fine, but any sign of a conflict and I'll need a PR.
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
> include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> index 4836947e1521..b8443a360646 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
> @@ -459,15 +460,14 @@ static void s5m8767_regulator_config_ext_control(struct s5m8767_info *s5m8767,
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!gpio_is_valid(rdata->ext_control_gpio)) {
> + if (!rdata->ext_control_gpiod) {
> dev_warn(s5m8767->dev,
> "ext-control for %s: GPIO not valid, ignoring\n",
> - rdata->reg_node->name);
> + rdata->reg_node->name);
> return;
> }
>
> - config->ena_gpio = rdata->ext_control_gpio;
> - config->ena_gpio_flags = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH;
> + config->ena_gpiod = rdata->ext_control_gpiod;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -577,8 +577,14 @@ static int s5m8767_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev,
> continue;
> }
>
> - rdata->ext_control_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(reg_np,
> - "s5m8767,pmic-ext-control-gpios", 0);
> + rdata->ext_control_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(&pdev->dev,
> + reg_np,
> + "s5m8767,pmic-ext-control-gpios",
> + 0,
> + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
> + "s5m8767");
> + if (IS_ERR(rdata->ext_control_gpiod))
> + return PTR_ERR(rdata->ext_control_gpiod);
>
> rdata->id = i;
> rdata->initdata = of_get_regulator_init_data(
> @@ -954,10 +960,8 @@ static int s5m8767_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> config.driver_data = s5m8767;
> config.regmap = iodev->regmap_pmic;
> config.of_node = pdata->regulators[i].reg_node;
> - config.ena_gpio = -EINVAL;
> - config.ena_gpio_flags = 0;
> - config.ena_gpio_initialized = true;
> - if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->regulators[i].ext_control_gpio))
> + config.ena_gpiod = NULL;
> + if (pdata->regulators[i].ext_control_gpiod)
> s5m8767_regulator_config_ext_control(s5m8767,
> &pdata->regulators[i], &config);
>
> @@ -970,7 +974,7 @@ static int s5m8767_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->regulators[i].ext_control_gpio)) {
> + if (pdata->regulators[i].ext_control_gpiod) {
> ret = s5m8767_enable_ext_control(s5m8767, rdev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(s5m8767->dev,
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h
> index 5a23dd4df432..28f4ae76271d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
> #define STEP_12_5_MV 12500
> #define STEP_6_25_MV 6250
>
> +struct gpio_desc;
> +
> enum sec_device_type {
> S5M8751X,
> S5M8763X,
> @@ -151,7 +153,7 @@ struct sec_regulator_data {
> int id;
> struct regulator_init_data *initdata;
> struct device_node *reg_node;
> - int ext_control_gpio;
> + struct gpio_desc *ext_control_gpiod;
> };
>
> /*
--
Lee Jones
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog