[PATCH 14/19] staging: lustre: improve waiting in sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx

From: NeilBrown
Date: Mon Feb 12 2018 - 18:50:22 EST


Replace l_wait_event with wait_event_idle_timeout() and call the
handler function explicitly. This makes it more clear
what is happening.

Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
index 617e004d00f8..90e3b3022106 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
@@ -554,9 +554,8 @@ int ctx_check_refresh(struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx)
}

static
-int ctx_refresh_timeout(void *data)
+int ctx_refresh_timeout(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
{
- struct ptlrpc_request *req = data;
int rc;

/* conn_cnt is needed in expire_one_request */
@@ -575,10 +574,8 @@ int ctx_refresh_timeout(void *data)
}

static
-void ctx_refresh_interrupt(void *data)
+void ctx_refresh_interrupt(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
{
- struct ptlrpc_request *req = data;
-
spin_lock(&req->rq_lock);
req->rq_intr = 1;
spin_unlock(&req->rq_lock);
@@ -611,7 +608,6 @@ int sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx(struct ptlrpc_request *req, long timeout)
{
struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx = req->rq_cli_ctx;
struct ptlrpc_sec *sec;
- struct l_wait_info lwi;
int rc;

LASSERT(ctx);
@@ -743,10 +739,28 @@ int sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx(struct ptlrpc_request *req, long timeout)
req->rq_restart = 0;
spin_unlock(&req->rq_lock);

- lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(msecs_to_jiffies(timeout * MSEC_PER_SEC),
- ctx_refresh_timeout, ctx_refresh_interrupt,
- req);
- rc = l_wait_event(req->rq_reply_waitq, ctx_check_refresh(ctx), &lwi);
+ rc = wait_event_idle_timeout(req->rq_reply_waitq,
+ ctx_check_refresh(ctx),
+ timeout * HZ);
+ if (rc == 0 && ctx_refresh_timeout(req) == 0) {
+ /* Keep waiting, but enable some signals */
+ rc = l_wait_event_abortable(req->rq_reply_waitq,
+ ctx_check_refresh(ctx));
+ if (rc == 0)
+ rc = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (rc > 0)
+ /* condition is true */
+ rc = 0;
+ else if (rc == 0)
+ /* Timed out */
+ rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ else {
+ /* Aborted by signal */
+ rc = -EINTR;
+ ctx_refresh_interrupt(req);
+ }

/*
* following cases could lead us here: