RE: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON

[Brown, Aaron F]

> From: netdev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:netdev-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christophe JAILLET
> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 11:48 AM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: intel-wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Christophe
> JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON
> 
> 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
> The modified code should behave the same, because HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is
> 1
> and no other possible values of 'tx_type' would match the test.
> However, this is more future-proof, should other values be allowed one day.
> 
> See 'struct hwtstamp_config' in 'include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h'
> 
> This fixes a warning reported by smatch:
>    igb_xmit_frame_ring() warn: bit shifter 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' used for
> logical '&'
> 
> Fixes: 26bd4e2db06be ("igb: protect TX timestamping from API misuse")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@xxxxxxxxx>