Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/6] x86: Use global pages when PTI is disabled

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As long as PTI is disabled, it is possible to use global pages, as long
> as we remove them once PTI is enabled again. To do so, return the global
> bit to __supported_pte_mask and disable global pages using CR4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h |  6 ++++++
>  arch/x86/mm/init.c              | 14 ++++++--------
>  arch/x86/mm/tlb.c               |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index ea65cf951c49..3a44cb0a9f56 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -319,6 +319,12 @@ static inline void set_cpu_pti_disable(unsigned short disable)
>         WARN_ON_ONCE(preemptible());
>
>         pti_update_user_cs64(cpu_pti_disable(), disable);
> +       if (__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_GLOBAL) {
> +               if (disable)
> +                       cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_PGE);
> +               else
> +                       cr4_clear_bits(X86_CR4_PGE);
> +       }

This will be *extremely* slow, and I don't see the point at all.  What
are you accomplishing here?

At best, you might gain something by adjusting the page table entries
to get globalness back, but I see no reason to fiddle with CR4.  Also,
if you do any of this at all and you run on K8, you're at risk of
getting machine checks unless you're very careful to get the
invalidation right.

I would just drop this patch, personally.