GNU Mailman should be able to exclude unapproved subscribers from
posting. The spams should be removed from the archive to keep them
from being used to defame us.
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018, 16:00 Arnt Karlsen <arnt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 23:24:51 +0100, Antony wrote in message_______________________________________________
<201802252324.51976.Antony.Stone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Sunday 25 February 2018 at 23:17:40, info at smallinnovationsdot
nl wrote:a
Looking at the recent emails from throwaway mail addresses is it
particularidea to moderate all mail except the addresses that are
whitelisted? It is not that hard to recognize someones style of
writing and ditch unwanted mail from the list.
Good idea, I agree, but then again, how important is this
list to people trying to peddle such opinions?
..usually, they post under a throw-away name and then "tip"
mainstream
media off of the(ir own) rabid racist etc conspiracy theory etc hate
speach "we" spew here. The purpose is, to discredit us.
I can't help feeling that the adminstrative effort in filteringout
these undesirables is possibly greater than simply asking everyoneto
ignore the noise and wait until it goes away.
Just remember "do not feed the trolls".
..the problem with that approach, is, it leaves an un-opposed record
up on our forum, which they then can "tip" mainstream media about.
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Dng mailing list
Dng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng