Re: [PATCH 06/21] powerpc: Avoid comparison of unsigned long >= 0 in __access_ok

[Mathieu Malaterre]

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:50 AM, Christophe LEROY
<christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Le 26/02/2018 Ã 07:34, Christophe LEROY a Ãcrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 25/02/2018 Ã 18:22, Mathieu Malaterre a Ãcrit :
>>>
>>> Rewrite check size - 1 <= Y as size < Y since `size` is unsigned value.
>>> Fix warning (treated as error in W=1):
>>>
>>>    CC      arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.o
>>> In file included from ./include/linux/uaccess.h:14:0,
>>>                   from ./include/asm-generic/termios-base.h:8,
>>>                   from ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/termios.h:20,
>>>                   from ./include/uapi/linux/termios.h:6,
>>>                   from ./include/linux/tty.h:7,
>>>                   from arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c:36:
>>> ./include/asm-generic/termios-base.h: In function
>>> âuser_termio_to_kernel_termiosâ:
>>> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:52:35: error: comparison of unsigned
>>> expression >= 0 is always true [-Werror=type-limits]
>>>     (((size) == 0) || (((size) - 1) <= ((segment).seg - (addr)))))
>>>                                     ^
>>> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:58:3: note: in expansion of macro
>>> â__access_okâ
>>>     __access_ok((__force unsigned long)(addr), (size), get_fs()))
>>>     ^~~~~~~~~~~
>>> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:262:6: note: in expansion of macro
>>> âaccess_okâ
>>>    if (access_ok(VERIFY_READ, __gu_addr, (size)))   \
>>>        ^~~~~~~~~
>>> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:80:2: note: in expansion of macro
>>> â__get_user_checkâ
>>>    __get_user_check((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
>>>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> ./include/asm-generic/termios-base.h:36:6: note: in expansion of macro
>>> âget_userâ
>>>    if (get_user(termios->c_line, &termio->c_line) < 0)
>>>        ^~~~~~~~
>>> [...]
>>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>>> index 51bfeb8777f0..fadc406bd39d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
>>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
>>>   #define __access_ok(addr, size, segment)    \
>>>       (((addr) <= (segment).seg) &&        \
>>> -     (((size) == 0) || (((size) - 1) <= ((segment).seg - (addr)))))
>>> +     (((size) == 0) || ((size) < ((segment).seg - (addr)))))
>>
>>
>> IIUC, ((2 - 1) <= 1) is the same as (2 < 1) ?????
>

The whole series was pretty mediocre, but this one was actually pretty
destructive. Thanks for catching this.

>
> Note that I already try to submit a fix for this warning 3 years ago
> (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/418075/) and it was rejected with the
> following comment:
>
> Again, I don't think Linux enables this warning.  What did you do to
> produce this?  In any case, it's a bad warning that doesn't take macros
> into account, and the answer is not to make the code less clear by hiding
> the fact that zero is a special case.

Right. I'll try to see how to make W=1 run without error with an
alternate solution.

> Christophe
>
>
>>
>> Christophe
>>
>>>   #endif
>>>
>