Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: scpi: invoke frequency-invariance setter function

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Dietmar Eggemann
<dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/22/2018 11:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:10 PM, Dietmar Eggemann
>> <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency")
>>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> This is really minor, but I would reorder this slightly.
>
> Tried to figure out what would be the better order. Not sure since I saw
> different examples. Can you tell what would be the best tag order?

I was talking about the patch, not about tags, sorry for the confusion.

Frankly, I don't care about the ordering of the tags. :-)