[PATCH 4.9 20/39] Revert "usb: musb: host: dont start next rx urb if current one failed"

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>

commit 44eb5e12b845cc8a0634f21b70ef07d774eb4b25 upstream.

This reverts commit dbac5d07d13e330e6706813c9fde477140fb5d80.

commit dbac5d07d13e ("usb: musb: host: don't start next rx urb if current one failed")
along with commit b5801212229f ("usb: musb: host: clear rxcsr error bit if set")
try to solve the issue described in [1], but the latter alone is
sufficient, and the former causes the issue as in [2], so now revert it.

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=146173995117456&w=2
[2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=151689238420622&w=2

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v4.7+
Signed-off-by: Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c |    8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
@@ -418,13 +418,7 @@ static void musb_advance_schedule(struct
 		}
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * The pipe must be broken if current urb->status is set, so don't
-	 * start next urb.
-	 * TODO: to minimize the risk of regression, only check urb->status
-	 * for RX, until we have a test case to understand the behavior of TX.
-	 */
-	if ((!status || !is_in) && qh && qh->is_ready) {
+	if (qh != NULL && qh->is_ready) {
 		musb_dbg(musb, "... next ep%d %cX urb %p",
 		    hw_ep->epnum, is_in ? 'R' : 'T', next_urb(qh));
 		musb_start_urb(musb, is_in, qh);