Okay Noted!!
Since you raised concern on the patch I thought of reworking this patch.
But I can see that this patch is already applied for i2c/for-next.
Kindly let me know whether I should be sending follow-up patches on top
of i2c/for-next ?
Oops, that was a mistake on my side. I'll revert that patch. Please
think of the patch as not-applied-yet.
Thanks!