Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/54] 4.14.23-stable review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 07:36:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 06:38:59AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 02/27/2018 05:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 02:59:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On 02/26/2018 12:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.23 release.
> > > > > There are 54 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > let me know.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Responses should be made by Wed Feb 28 20:21:22 UTC 2018.
> > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > microblaze, m32r:
> > > > 
> > > > include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:8:2: warning: #warning inconsistent configuration, needs CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN [-Wcpp]
> > > >   #warning inconsistent configuration, needs CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> > > >    ^~~~~~~
> > > > /opt/buildbot/slave/stable-queue-4.14/build/lib/find_bit.c:176:15: error: redefinition of âfind_next_zero_bit_leâ
> > > > 
> > > > v4.15 is also affected (m32r builds in v4.15, though, for some reason).
> > > 
> > > This sounds like Arnd's Kbuild change 101110f6271c ("Kbuild: always
> > > define endianess in kconfig.h")
> > > 
> > > Does this problem also show up in Linus's tree?
> > > 
> > > Arnd, any ideas?
> > > 
> > 
> > Missing for m32r: c95f121142a41c951fd62683a5574f2a7b37c573
> > Missing for microblaze: 71e7673dadfdae0605d4c1f66ecb4b045c79fe0f
> 
> Thanks, both queued up, and I've pushed out new 4.14.y and 4.15.y trees.
> 
I started another build to test it; I'll let you know after it is complete.

Guenter