[PATCH 3.16 096/254] MIPS: Respect the FCSR exception mask for `si_code'

[Ben Hutchings]

3.16.55-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit ed2d72c1eb3643b7c109bdf387563d9b9a30c279 upstream.

Respect the FCSR exception mask when interpreting the IEEE 754 exception
condition to report with SIGFPE in `si_code', so as not to use one that
has been masked where a different one set in parallel caused the FPE
hardware exception to trigger.  As per the IEEE Std 754 the Inexact
exception can happen together with Overflow or Underflow.

Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9703/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/mips/kernel/traps.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
  * Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2012 MIPS Technologies, Inc.  All rights reserved.
  * Copyright (C) 2014, Imagination Technologies Ltd.
  */
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <linux/bug.h>
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <linux/context_tracking.h>
@@ -785,7 +786,15 @@ asmlinkage void do_fpe(struct pt_regs *r
 		process_fpemu_return(sig, fault_addr);
 
 		goto out;
-	} else if (fcr31 & FPU_CSR_INV_X)
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Inexact can happen together with Overflow or Underflow.
+	 * Respect the mask to deliver the correct exception.
+	 */
+	fcr31 &= (fcr31 & FPU_CSR_ALL_E) <<
+		 (ffs(FPU_CSR_ALL_X) - ffs(FPU_CSR_ALL_E));
+	if (fcr31 & FPU_CSR_INV_X)
 		info.si_code = FPE_FLTINV;
 	else if (fcr31 & FPU_CSR_DIV_X)
 		info.si_code = FPE_FLTDIV;