[PATCH 09/45] arm64: Make USER_DS an inclusive limit

[Alex Shi]

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>

commit 51369e398d0d upstream.

Currently, USER_DS represents an exclusive limit while KERNEL_DS is
inclusive. In order to do some clever trickery for speculation-safe
masking, we need them both to behave equivalently - there aren't enough
bits to make KERNEL_DS exclusive, so we have precisely one option. This
also happens to correct a longstanding false negative for a range
ending on the very top byte of kernel memory.

Mark Rutland points out that we've actually got the semantics of
addresses vs. segments muddled up in most of the places we need to
amend, so shuffle the {USER,KERNEL}_DS definitions around such that we
can correct those properly instead of just pasting "-1"s everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
(cherry picked from commit 83b20dff71ea949431cf57c6aebaaf7ebd5c1991)
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h |  3 +++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h   | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S          |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c              |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
index 4258f4d..5917147 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
 
 #define TASK_SIZE_64		(UL(1) << VA_BITS)
 
+#define KERNEL_DS	UL(-1)
+#define USER_DS		(TASK_SIZE_64 - 1)
+
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 09c9b59..7b1eb49 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #include <asm/errno.h>
 #include <asm/memory.h>
 #include <asm/compiler.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
 
 #define VERIFY_READ 0
 #define VERIFY_WRITE 1
@@ -62,10 +63,7 @@ struct exception_table_entry
 
 extern int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs);
 
-#define KERNEL_DS	(-1UL)
 #define get_ds()	(KERNEL_DS)
-
-#define USER_DS		TASK_SIZE_64
 #define get_fs()	(current_thread_info()->addr_limit)
 
 static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs)
@@ -90,22 +88,32 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs)
  * Returns 1 if the range is valid, 0 otherwise.
  *
  * This is equivalent to the following test:
- * (u65)addr + (u65)size <= current->addr_limit
- *
- * This needs 65-bit arithmetic.
+ * (u65)addr + (u65)size <= (u65)current->addr_limit + 1
  */
-#define __range_ok(addr, size)						\
-({									\
-	unsigned long __addr = (unsigned long __force)(addr);		\
-	unsigned long flag, roksum;					\
-	__chk_user_ptr(addr);						\
-	asm("adds %1, %1, %3; ccmp %1, %4, #2, cc; cset %0, ls"		\
-		: "=&r" (flag), "=&r" (roksum)				\
-		: "1" (__addr), "Ir" (size),				\
-		  "r" (current_thread_info()->addr_limit)		\
-		: "cc");						\
-	flag;								\
-})
+static inline unsigned long __range_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
+{
+	unsigned long limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit;
+
+	__chk_user_ptr(addr);
+	asm volatile(
+	// A + B <= C + 1 for all A,B,C, in four easy steps:
+	// 1: X = A + B; X' = X % 2^64
+	"	adds	%0, %0, %2\n"
+	// 2: Set C = 0 if X > 2^64, to guarantee X' > C in step 4
+	"	csel	%1, xzr, %1, hi\n"
+	// 3: Set X' = ~0 if X >= 2^64. For X == 2^64, this decrements X'
+	//    to compensate for the carry flag being set in step 4. For
+	//    X > 2^64, X' merely has to remain nonzero, which it does.
+	"	csinv	%0, %0, xzr, cc\n"
+	// 4: For X < 2^64, this gives us X' - C - 1 <= 0, where the -1
+	//    comes from the carry in being clear. Otherwise, we are
+	//    testing X' - C == 0, subject to the previous adjustments.
+	"	sbcs	xzr, %0, %1\n"
+	"	cset	%0, ls\n"
+	: "+r" (addr), "+r" (limit) : "Ir" (size) : "cc");
+
+	return addr;
+}
 
 /*
  * When dealing with data aborts, watchpoints, or instruction traps we may end
@@ -114,7 +122,7 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs)
  */
 #define untagged_addr(addr)		sign_extend64(addr, 55)
 
-#define access_ok(type, addr, size)	__range_ok(addr, size)
+#define access_ok(type, addr, size)	__range_ok((unsigned long)(addr), size)
 #define user_addr_max			get_fs
 
 #define _ASM_EXTABLE(from, to)						\
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 478f0fe..6915697 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
 	/* Save the task's original addr_limit and set USER_DS (TASK_SIZE_64) */
 	ldr	x20, [tsk, #TI_ADDR_LIMIT]
 	str	x20, [sp, #S_ORIG_ADDR_LIMIT]
-	mov	x20, #TASK_SIZE_64
+	mov	x20, #USER_DS
 	str	x20, [tsk, #TI_ADDR_LIMIT]
 	/* No need to reset PSTATE.UAO, hardware's already set it to 0 for us */
 	.endif /* \el == 0 */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index 403fe9e..4df70c9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
 		mm_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
 	}
 
-	if (is_permission_fault(esr) && (addr < USER_DS)) {
+	if (is_permission_fault(esr) && (addr < TASK_SIZE)) {
 		/* regs->orig_addr_limit may be 0 if we entered from EL0 */
 		if (regs->orig_addr_limit == KERNEL_DS)
 			die("Accessing user space memory with fs=KERNEL_DS", regs, esr);
-- 
2.7.4