Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] gpio: rcar: Use wakeup_path i.s.o. explicit clock handling

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Linus,

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Since commit ab82fa7da4dce5c7 ("gpio: rcar: Prevent module clock disable
>> when wake-up is enabled"), when a GPIO is used for wakeup, the GPIO
>> block's module clock (if exists) is manually kept running during system
>> suspend, to make sure the device stays active.
>>
>> However, this explicit clock handling is merely a workaround for a
>> failure to properly communicate wakeup information to the device core.
>>
>> Instead, set the device's power.wakeup_path field, to indicate this
>> device is part of the wakeup path.  Depending on the PM Domain's
>> active_wakeup configuration, the genpd core code will keep the device
>> enabled (and the clock running) during system suspend when needed.
>> This allows for the removal of all explicit clock handling code from the
>> driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v3:
>
> Patch applied for v4.16 fixes.

Are you aware this conflicts with commit 51750fb167a05468 ("gpio: gpio-rcar:
Support S2RAM") in gpio/for-next?

You can find the resolution in
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git/tree/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c?h=renesas-drivers-2018-02-28-v4.16-rc3

If there's anything else I can do, just ask!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds