Re: [RFC PATCH] Randomization of address chosen by mmap.

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 11:30:28PM +0300, Ilya Smith wrote:
> This is a really good question. Lets think we choose address with random-length 
> guard hole. This length is limited by some configuration as you described. For 
> instance let it be 1MB. Now according to current implementation, we still may 
> fill this gap with small allocations with size less than 1MB. Attacker will 
> going to build attack base on this predictable behaviour - he jus need to spray 
> with 1 MB chunks (or less, with some expectation). This attack harder but not 
> impossible.

Ah, I didn't mean that.  I was thinking that we can change the
implementation to reserve 1-N pages after the end of the mapping.
So you can't map anything else in there, and any load/store into that
region will segfault.