Re: [PATCH V4 0/3] Use mm_struct and switch_mm() instead of manually

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On 29 January 2018 at 10:51, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 26 January 2018 at 21:16, Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Jan, at 01:01:04PM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
>>> From: Sai Praneeth <sai.praneeth.prakhya@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Presently, in x86, to invoke any efi function like
>>> efi_set_virtual_address_map() or any efi_runtime_service() the code path
>>> typically involves read_cr3() (save previous pgd), write_cr3()
>>> (write efi_pgd) and calling efi function. Likewise after returning from
>>> efi function the code path typically involves read_cr3() (save efi_pgd),
>>> write_cr3() (write previous pgd). We do this couple of times in efi
>>> subsystem of Linux kernel, instead we can use helper function
>>> efi_switch_mm() to do this. This improves readability and maintainability.
>>> Also, instead of maintaining a separate struct "efi_scratch" to store/restore
>>> efi_pgd, we can use mm_struct to do this.
>>
>> FWIW this series looks OK to me.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks Matt
>
> I know the x86 guys have been rather busy lately, so I will give them
> some more time to respond. If there are no objections raised, I will
> queue it for v4.17 in a couple of weeks.

Queued in linux-efi/next

Thanks all.