[PATCH 4.1 08/65] x86/mm, sched/core: Uninline switch_mm()
From: Pavel Tatashin
Date: Mon Mar 05 2018 - 19:40:35 EST
commit 69c0319aabba45bcf33178916a2f06967b4adede upstream.
It's fairly large and it has quite a few callers. This may also
help untangle some headers down the road.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/54f3367803e7f80b2be62c8a21879aa74b1a5f57.1461688545.git.luto@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
(cherry picked from commit 70a39c7fd167399fde76aeac314dce026a255b49)
Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Conflicts:
arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 97 +----------------------------------
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index 73e38f14ddeb..375fafccb32c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -92,101 +92,8 @@ static inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
#endif
}
-static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
- struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
- if (likely(prev != next)) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.state, TLBSTATE_OK);
- this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm, next);
-#endif
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
-
- /*
- * Re-load page tables.
- *
- * This logic has an ordering constraint:
- *
- * CPU 0: Write to a PTE for 'next'
- * CPU 0: load bit 1 in mm_cpumask. if nonzero, send IPI.
- * CPU 1: set bit 1 in next's mm_cpumask
- * CPU 1: load from the PTE that CPU 0 writes (implicit)
- *
- * We need to prevent an outcome in which CPU 1 observes
- * the new PTE value and CPU 0 observes bit 1 clear in
- * mm_cpumask. (If that occurs, then the IPI will never
- * be sent, and CPU 0's TLB will contain a stale entry.)
- *
- * The bad outcome can occur if either CPU's load is
- * reordered before that CPU's store, so both CPUs must
- * execute full barriers to prevent this from happening.
- *
- * Thus, switch_mm needs a full barrier between the
- * store to mm_cpumask and any operation that could load
- * from next->pgd. TLB fills are special and can happen
- * due to instruction fetches or for no reason at all,
- * and neither LOCK nor MFENCE orders them.
- * Fortunately, load_cr3() is serializing and gives the
- * ordering guarantee we need.
- *
- */
- load_cr3(next->pgd);
-
- trace_tlb_flush(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
-
- /* Stop flush ipis for the previous mm */
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
-
- /* Load per-mm CR4 state */
- load_mm_cr4(next);
-
- /*
- * Load the LDT, if the LDT is different.
- *
- * It's possible that prev->context.ldt doesn't match
- * the LDT register. This can happen if leave_mm(prev)
- * was called and then modify_ldt changed
- * prev->context.ldt but suppressed an IPI to this CPU.
- * In this case, prev->context.ldt != NULL, because we
- * never set context.ldt to NULL while the mm still
- * exists. That means that next->context.ldt !=
- * prev->context.ldt, because mms never share an LDT.
- */
- if (unlikely(prev->context.ldt != next->context.ldt))
- load_mm_ldt(next);
- }
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- else {
- this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.state, TLBSTATE_OK);
- BUG_ON(this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm) != next);
-
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next))) {
- /*
- * On established mms, the mm_cpumask is only changed
- * from irq context, from ptep_clear_flush() while in
- * lazy tlb mode, and here. Irqs are blocked during
- * schedule, protecting us from simultaneous changes.
- */
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
-
- /*
- * We were in lazy tlb mode and leave_mm disabled
- * tlb flush IPI delivery. We must reload CR3
- * to make sure to use no freed page tables.
- *
- * As above, load_cr3() is serializing and orders TLB
- * fills with respect to the mm_cpumask write.
- */
- load_cr3(next->pgd);
- trace_tlb_flush(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
- load_mm_cr4(next);
- load_mm_ldt(next);
- }
- }
-#endif
-}
+extern void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
+ struct task_struct *tsk);
#define activate_mm(prev, next) \
do { \
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index a1aa5f59e3ad..40c640980720 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -59,6 +59,106 @@ void leave_mm(int cpu)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(leave_mm);
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+
+void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
+ struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ if (likely(prev != next)) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.state, TLBSTATE_OK);
+ this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm, next);
+#endif
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
+
+ /*
+ * Re-load page tables.
+ *
+ * This logic has an ordering constraint:
+ *
+ * CPU 0: Write to a PTE for 'next'
+ * CPU 0: load bit 1 in mm_cpumask. if nonzero, send IPI.
+ * CPU 1: set bit 1 in next's mm_cpumask
+ * CPU 1: load from the PTE that CPU 0 writes (implicit)
+ *
+ * We need to prevent an outcome in which CPU 1 observes
+ * the new PTE value and CPU 0 observes bit 1 clear in
+ * mm_cpumask. (If that occurs, then the IPI will never
+ * be sent, and CPU 0's TLB will contain a stale entry.)
+ *
+ * The bad outcome can occur if either CPU's load is
+ * reordered before that CPU's store, so both CPUs must
+ * execute full barriers to prevent this from happening.
+ *
+ * Thus, switch_mm needs a full barrier between the
+ * store to mm_cpumask and any operation that could load
+ * from next->pgd. TLB fills are special and can happen
+ * due to instruction fetches or for no reason at all,
+ * and neither LOCK nor MFENCE orders them.
+ * Fortunately, load_cr3() is serializing and gives the
+ * ordering guarantee we need.
+ *
+ */
+ load_cr3(next->pgd);
+
+ trace_tlb_flush(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
+
+ /* Stop flush ipis for the previous mm */
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
+
+ /* Load per-mm CR4 state */
+ load_mm_cr4(next);
+
+ /*
+ * Load the LDT, if the LDT is different.
+ *
+ * It's possible that prev->context.ldt doesn't match
+ * the LDT register. This can happen if leave_mm(prev)
+ * was called and then modify_ldt changed
+ * prev->context.ldt but suppressed an IPI to this CPU.
+ * In this case, prev->context.ldt != NULL, because we
+ * never set context.ldt to NULL while the mm still
+ * exists. That means that next->context.ldt !=
+ * prev->context.ldt, because mms never share an LDT.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(prev->context.ldt != next->context.ldt))
+ load_mm_ldt(next);
+ }
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ else {
+ this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.state, TLBSTATE_OK);
+ BUG_ON(this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm) != next);
+
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next))) {
+ /*
+ * On established mms, the mm_cpumask is only changed
+ * from irq context, from ptep_clear_flush() while in
+ * lazy tlb mode, and here. Irqs are blocked during
+ * schedule, protecting us from simultaneous changes.
+ */
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
+
+ /*
+ * We were in lazy tlb mode and leave_mm disabled
+ * tlb flush IPI delivery. We must reload CR3
+ * to make sure to use no freed page tables.
+ *
+ * As above, load_cr3() is serializing and orders TLB
+ * fills with respect to the mm_cpumask write.
+ */
+ load_cr3(next->pgd);
+ trace_tlb_flush(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
+ load_mm_cr4(next);
+ load_mm_ldt(next);
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+
/*
* The flush IPI assumes that a thread switch happens in this order:
* [cpu0: the cpu that switches]
--
2.16.2