On 02/27/2018 11:03 PM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:I am planning to add tachometer support in pwm-fan.c driver (drivers/hwmon/) instead of adding new generic-pwm-tachometer.c driver. Measuring RPM value will be done in pwm-fan driver itself using pwm capture feature and will add new sysfs attributes under this driver to report rpm value of fan.
On 02/28/2018 08:12 AM, Rajkumar Rampelli wrote:You are absolutely correct.
On Wednesday 28 February 2018 11:28 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 02/27/2018 09:38 PM, Rajkumar Rampelli wrote:Sorry, I just wanted to confirm whether my understanding is correct or not before implementing it actually.
On Wednesday 21 February 2018 08:20 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 02/20/2018 10:58 PM, Rajkumar Rampelli wrote:Guenter Roeck,
Add generic PWM based tachometer driver via HWMON interface
to report the RPM of motor. This drivers get the period/duty
cycle from PWM IP which captures the motor PWM output.
This driver implements a simple interface for monitoring the speed of
a fan and exposes it in roatations per minute (RPM) to the user space
by using the hwmon's sysfs interface
Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Rampelli <rrajk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/hwmon/generic-pwm-tachometer | 17 +++++
drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 10 +++
drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/hwmon/generic-pwm-tachometer.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 140 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/hwmon/generic-pwm-tachometer
create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/generic-pwm-tachometer.c
diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/generic-pwm-tachometer b/Documentation/hwmon/generic-pwm-tachometer
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e0713ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/hwmon/generic-pwm-tachometer
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+Kernel driver generic-pwm-tachometer
+====================================
+
+This driver enables the use of a PWM module to monitor a fan. It uses the
+generic PWM interface and can be used on SoCs as along as the SoC supports
+Tachometer controller that moniors the Fan speed in periods.
+
+Author: Rajkumar Rampelli <rrajk@xxxxxxxxxx>
+
+Description
+-----------
+
+The driver implements a simple interface for monitoring the Fan speed using
+PWM module and Tachometer controller. It requests period value through PWM
+capture interface to Tachometer and measures the Rotations per minute using
+received period value. It exposes the Fan speed in RPM to the user space by
+using the hwmon's sysfs interface.
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
index ef23553..8912dcb 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
@@ -1878,6 +1878,16 @@ config SENSORS_XGENE
If you say yes here you get support for the temperature
and power sensors for APM X-Gene SoC.
+config GENERIC_PWM_TACHOMETER
+ tristate "Generic PWM based tachometer driver"
+ depends on PWM
+ help
+ Enables a driver to use PWM signal from motor to use
+ for measuring the motor speed. The RPM is captured by
+ PWM modules which has PWM capture capability and this
+ drivers reads the captured data from PWM IP to convert
+ it to speed in RPM.
+
if ACPI
comment "ACPI drivers"
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
index f814b4a..9dcc374 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_WM8350) += wm8350-hwmon.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_XGENE) += xgene-hwmon.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PMBUS) += pmbus/
+obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PWM_TACHOMETER) += generic-pwm-tachometer.o
ccflags-$(CONFIG_HWMON_DEBUG_CHIP) := -DDEBUG
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/generic-pwm-tachometer.c b/drivers/hwmon/generic-pwm-tachometer.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9354d43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/generic-pwm-tachometer.c
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2017-2018, NVIDIA CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
+ * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
+ * more details.
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/hwmon.h>
+#include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
+
+struct pwm_hwmon_tach {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct pwm_device *pwm;
+ struct device *hwmon;
+};
+
+static ssize_t show_rpm(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf)
+{
+ struct pwm_hwmon_tach *ptt = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct pwm_device *pwm = ptt->pwm;
+ struct pwm_capture result;
+ int err;
+ unsigned int rpm = 0;
+
+ err = pwm_capture(pwm, &result, 0);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ dev_err(ptt->dev, "Failed to capture PWM: %d\n", err);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ if (result.period)
+ rpm = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(60ULL * NSEC_PER_SEC,
+ result.period);
+
+ return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", rpm);
+}
+
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(rpm, 0444, show_rpm, NULL, 0);
+
+static struct attribute *pwm_tach_attrs[] = {
+ &sensor_dev_attr_rpm.dev_attr.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
"rpm" is not a standard hwmon sysfs attribute. If you don't provide
a single standard hwmon sysfs attribute, having a hwmon driver is pointless.
I will define a new hwmon sysfs attribute node called "hwmon_tachometer_attributes" in hwmon.h like below and update the same in tachometer hwmon driver. Is it fine ?
enum hwmon_tachometer_attributes {
Are you kidding me ?
Guenter
Or, shall I add this attribute as a part of fan attributes with "hwmon_fan_rpm" ? or any other way to do it ? I need your inputs in fixing this.
I think he wants the attribute to be named according to the properties in this document: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface. I guess the attribute would then map to fan1_input, though I'm not sure if that's 100% correct either since this could technically be attached to something other than a fan. But I would think in practice that's not a big concern.
Guenter,
Please correct me as well if I'm wrong.
While I am not opposed to ABI changes, the merits of those would need to be
discussed on the mailing list. But replacing "fan1_input" with "rpm" is
not an acceptable ABI change, even if it may measure something that turns
but isn't a fan.
If this _is_ in fact supposed to be used for something else but fans, we
would have to discuss what that might be, and if hwmon is the appropriate
subsystem to measure and report it. This does to some degree lead back to
my concern of having the "fan" part of this patch series in the pwm core.
I am still not sure if that makes sense.
Thanks,
Guenter
Thank you,
Mikko
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html