Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Wed Mar 07 2018 - 06:22:26 EST
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo, Archit,
>
> On 07.03.2018 05:48, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2018ë 03ì 07ì 11:12, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> Hi Rob and Andrzej,
>>>
>>> On 2018ë 03ì 06ì 21:53, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>>> Hi Rob, Chanwoo, Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27.02.2018 08:11, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for reviews of previous iterations.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset introduces USB physical connector bindings, together with
>>>>> working example.
>>>>> I have removed RFC prefix - the patchset seems to be heading
>>>>> to a happy end :)
>>>>>
>>>>> v5: fixed extra parenthesis in dts, renamed extcon function.
>>>>> v4: improved binding descriptions, added missing reg in dts.
>>>>> v3: Separate binding for Samsung 11-pin connector, added full-blown USB-C
>>>>> example.
>>>>> v2: I have addressed comments by Rob and Laurent, thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in datail are described in the patches.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Andrzej
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrzej Hajda (5):
>>>>> dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector
>>>>> dt-bindings: add bindings for Samsung micro-USB 11-pin connector
>>>>> arm64: dts: exynos: add micro-USB connector node to TM2 platforms
>>>>> arm64: dts: exynos: add OF graph between MHL and USB connector
>>>>> extcon: add possibility to get extcon device by OF node
>>>>>
>>>>> Maciej Purski (1):
>>>>> drm/bridge/sii8620: use micro-USB cable detection logic to detect MHL
>>>> It looks like all patches received R-B or acks (I forgot add Krzysztof's
>>>> acks for dts part).
>>>> Now I have a question how to merge them.
>>>> The only functional dependency is between bridge and extcon, and from
>>>> the formal PoV bindings should be merged 1st.
>>>> I can merge it:
>>>> 1. All patches via drm-misc tree.
>>>> 2. All patches except dts via drm-misc, and Krzysztof will merge dts via
>>>> samsung-soc tree.
>>>>
>>>> Is it OK, for all? Better ideas?
>>> Krzysztof picked the dts patches. I'll make the immutable branch based on v4.16-rc1
>>> and apply them except for dts patchs. And I'll send the immutable branch to Rob and Andrzej.
>>>
>>>
>> I made the immutable branch[1] as following: If you agree, I'll send pull request.
>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/log/?h=ib-extcon-drm-dt-v4.17
>>
>> Or you can make the immutable branch and send pull request to Rob and me.
>>
>
> It seems you took v5 instead of v6 version of extcon patch.
I also took v5:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10244407/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10244431/
There was no v6 in samsung-soc patchwork. Is it a problem for DTS?
BR,
Krzysztof