Re: [PATCH v2] regmap: irq: fix ack-invert

From: Mark Brown
Date: Wed Mar 07 2018 - 09:36:39 EST


On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 06:57:49AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:

> > By using regmap_irq_update_bits to ACK the interrupts we use the masked
> > status bits so we take care not to affect any other bits then use
> > ack_invert to determine if we clear or set those bits.

> This change to use regmap_irq_update_bits() now breaks things for
> me with cpcap interrupts. So it seems to cause a non-inverted mode
> regression. There should be no need to read the ack register, I
> gues that's the whole idea of having a separate ack register :)

Yes, that'd be my expectation as well - the register should be just
write only. regmap_update_bits() definitely isn't the right thing here
since it will suppress the write part of the read/modify/write cycle if
it detects that it didn't actually modify anything as an optimization.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature