Re: [PATCH] ssb:: use put_device() if device_register fail

[arvindY]

On Wednesday 07 March 2018 10:17 PM, Michael Büsch wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Mar 2018 15:31:30 +0530
> Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > if device_register() returned an error! Always use put_device()
> > to give up the reference initialized.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/ssb/main.c | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c
> > index 65420a9..c4449e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ssb/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c
> > @@ -521,6 +521,7 @@ static int ssb_devices_register(struct ssb_bus *bus)
> >   			ssb_err("Could not register %s\n", dev_name(dev));
> >   			/* Set dev to NULL to not unregister
> >   			 * dev on error unwinding. */
> > +			put_device(dev);
> >   			sdev->dev = NULL;
> >   			kfree(devwrap);
> >   			goto error;
>
> I don't think this is correct.
> The dev structure is allocated as part of devwrap, which is freed here.
>
> Why do you think we need put_device here?
Yes this patch is not correct, We must not use kfree() after you called 
device_register() (even
if it was not successful!) -- see the comment for device_register().
I will delete kfree() and send updated patch.

~arvind