Re: [PATCH 00/17] Include linux trace docs to Sphinx TOC tree

[Du, Changbin]

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:46:49AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:43:37 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:34:22 +0800
> > "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Ten days past, will you accept this serias? Thank you!
> > 
> > Currently I'm very overloaded with other code that needs to get done
> > ASAP, and I need to balance what is critical and what is not. I don't
> > have time to review this, as this isn't critical, and can wait.
> > 
> > If Jon can review it to make sure that it doesn't change the
> > readability of the text, then I'll trust his judgment. 
> 
> So I've spent a while working through the patches.  I think it's a
> well-done RST conversion carried out with a light hand; I do not believe
> there are any readability issues with the resulting text files.
> 
> I will note that the series adds some new build warnings:
> 
> > Documentation/trace/events.rst:45: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/trace/events.rst:49: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/trace/events.rst:193: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> > Documentation/trace/events.rst:114: WARNING: Unknown target name: "common".
> > Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst:2620: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> 
> These point to places where the resulting formatted docs are, in fact,
> incorrect.  I had to append the attached patch to the series to make those
> problems go away.  The warnings are there for a purpose!
> 
> Anyway, with that, the patch series is applied.  Thanks for helping to
> improve the docs, and my apologies for taking so long to get to this.
> 
> jon
> 
I am also appriciated for your review. And I am glade to see these docs can appear
in the new beautiful html documentation! Thnak you.

- changbin