Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi/esrt: fix unsupported version initialization failure

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On 8 March 2018 at 18:15, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 8 March 2018 at 18:00, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 8 March 2018 at 16:11, Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 2/24/2018 2:20 AM, Dave Young wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 02/23/18 at 12:42pm, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If ESRT initialization fails due to an unsupported version, the
>>>>> early_memremap allocation is never unmapped. This will cause an
>>>>> early ioremap leak. So, make sure to unmap the memory allocation
>>>>> before returning from efi_esrt_init().
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c | 2 +-
>>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c
>>>>> index c47e0c6..504f3c3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c
>>>>> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ void __init efi_esrt_init(void)
>>>>>         } else {
>>>>>                 pr_err("Unsupported ESRT version %lld.\n",
>>>>>                        tmpesrt.fw_resource_version);
>>>>> -               return;
>>>>> +               goto err_memunmap;
>>>>>         }
>>>>>         if (tmpesrt.fw_resource_count > 0 && max - size < entry_size) {
>>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Thank you Dave for your review here and input on the other patch.
>>>
>>> Ard,
>>>
>>> Can this patch be picked up? I understand patch 2 is not acceptable, but
>>> this one should
>>> be good to go I think.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah you're right. I'll pick it up as a bugfix.
>
> Actually, on second thought, could you respin this patch, and just
> move the memunamp() to right after the memcpy()? That way, we can get
> rid of all the 'goto err_memunmap's afaict
>

OK, now I'm confused. Does anyone have a clue why in efi_esrt_init()
the memremap() is done a second time? AFAICT it just reserves the
region, it does not actually access the second mapping at all.