Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] riscv/spinlock: Strengthen implementations with fences

[Andrea Parri]

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:33:49AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:

[...]

> I'm going to go produce a new set of spinlocks, I think it'll be a bit more
> coherent then.
> 
> I'm keeping your other patch in my queue for now, it generally looks good
> but I haven't looked closely yet.

Patches 1 and 2 address a same issue ("release-to-acquire"); this is also
expressed, more or less explicitly, in the corresponding commit messages:
it might make sense to "queue" them together, and to build the new locks
on top of these (even if this meant "rewrite all of/a large portion of
spinlock.h"...).

  Andrea


> 
> Thanks!
> 
> >
> >  Andrea
> >
> >
> >>
> >>   Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> >>index 2fd27e8ef1fd..9b166ea81fe5 100644
> >>--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> >>+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> >>@@ -15,128 +15,7 @@
> >>#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H
> >>#define _ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H
> >>
> >>-#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >>-#include <asm/current.h>
> >>-
> >>-/*
> >>- * Simple spin lock operations.  These provide no fairness guarantees.
> >>- */
> >>-
> >>-/* FIXME: Replace this with a ticket lock, like MIPS. */
> >>-
> >>-#define arch_spin_is_locked(x)	(READ_ONCE((x)->lock) != 0)
> >>-
> >>-static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> >>-{
> >>-	__asm__ __volatile__ (
> >>-		"amoswap.w.rl x0, x0, %0"
> >>-		: "=A" (lock->lock)
> >>-		:: "memory");
> >>-}
> >>-
> >>-static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> >>-{
> >>-	int tmp = 1, busy;
> >>-
> >>-	__asm__ __volatile__ (
> >>-		"amoswap.w.aq %0, %2, %1"
> >>-		: "=r" (busy), "+A" (lock->lock)
> >>-		: "r" (tmp)
> >>-		: "memory");
> >>-
> >>-	return !busy;
> >>-}
> >>-
> >>-static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> >>-{
> >>-	while (1) {
> >>-		if (arch_spin_is_locked(lock))
> >>-			continue;
> >>-
> >>-		if (arch_spin_trylock(lock))
> >>-			break;
> >>-	}
> >>-}
> >>-
> >>-/***********************************************************/
> >>-
> >>-static inline void arch_read_lock(arch_rwlock_t *lock)
> >>-{
> >>-	int tmp;
> >>-
> >>-	__asm__ __volatile__(
> >>-		"1:	lr.w	%1, %0\n"
> >>-		"	bltz	%1, 1b\n"
> >>-		"	addi	%1, %1, 1\n"
> >>-		"	sc.w.aq	%1, %1, %0\n"
> >>-		"	bnez	%1, 1b\n"
> >>-		: "+A" (lock->lock), "=&r" (tmp)
> >>-		:: "memory");
> >>-}
> >>-
> >>-static inline void arch_write_lock(arch_rwlock_t *lock)
> >>-{
> >>-	int tmp;
> >>-
> >>-	__asm__ __volatile__(
> >>-		"1:	lr.w	%1, %0\n"
> >>-		"	bnez	%1, 1b\n"
> >>-		"	li	%1, -1\n"
> >>-		"	sc.w.aq	%1, %1, %0\n"
> >>-		"	bnez	%1, 1b\n"
> >>-		: "+A" (lock->lock), "=&r" (tmp)
> >>-		:: "memory");
> >>-}
> >>-
> >>-static inline int arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *lock)
> >>-{
> >>-	int busy;
> >>-
> >>-	__asm__ __volatile__(
> >>-		"1:	lr.w	%1, %0\n"
> >>-		"	bltz	%1, 1f\n"
> >>-		"	addi	%1, %1, 1\n"
> >>-		"	sc.w.aq	%1, %1, %0\n"
> >>-		"	bnez	%1, 1b\n"
> >>-		"1:\n"
> >>-		: "+A" (lock->lock), "=&r" (busy)
> >>-		:: "memory");
> >>-
> >>-	return !busy;
> >>-}
> >>-
> >>-static inline int arch_write_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *lock)
> >>-{
> >>-	int busy;
> >>-
> >>-	__asm__ __volatile__(
> >>-		"1:	lr.w	%1, %0\n"
> >>-		"	bnez	%1, 1f\n"
> >>-		"	li	%1, -1\n"
> >>-		"	sc.w.aq	%1, %1, %0\n"
> >>-		"	bnez	%1, 1b\n"
> >>-		"1:\n"
> >>-		: "+A" (lock->lock), "=&r" (busy)
> >>-		:: "memory");
> >>-
> >>-	return !busy;
> >>-}
> >>-
> >>-static inline void arch_read_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *lock)
> >>-{
> >>-	__asm__ __volatile__(
> >>-		"amoadd.w.rl x0, %1, %0"
> >>-		: "+A" (lock->lock)
> >>-		: "r" (-1)
> >>-		: "memory");
> >>-}
> >>-
> >>-static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *lock)
> >>-{
> >>-	__asm__ __volatile__ (
> >>-		"amoswap.w.rl x0, x0, %0"
> >>-		: "=A" (lock->lock)
> >>-		:: "memory");
> >>-}
> >>+#include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
> >>+#include <asm-generic/qrwlock.h>
> >>
> >>#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H */
> >>