Re: [PATCH] clk: clk-fixed-factor: Use new macro CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Rajan Vaja (2018-03-08 06:15:00)
> Fixed factor clock has two initialization at of_clk_init()
> time and also during platform driver probe. So declare the
> fixed factor clock with CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER instead of
> CLK_OF_DECLARE.
> 
> See below commit for reference:
> "clk: sunxi: apb0: Use new macro CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER"
> (sha1: 915128b621a05c63fa58ca9e4cbdf394bbe592f3)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rajan Vaja <rajanv@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> index a5d402d..d72ef2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c
> @@ -196,8 +196,9 @@ void __init of_fixed_factor_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
>  {
>         _of_fixed_factor_clk_setup(node);
>  }
> -CLK_OF_DECLARE(fixed_factor_clk, "fixed-factor-clock",
> -               of_fixed_factor_clk_setup);
> +
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER(fixed_factor_clk, "fixed-factor-clock",
> +                     of_fixed_factor_clk_setup);
> 

Is the intent to register the clk twice? I believe things are working as
intended without this patch, so maybe you can explain a little more what
you're trying to fix.