Re: [PATCH v2] regmap: irq: fix ack-invert
From: Tim Harvey
Date: Fri Mar 09 2018 - 13:52:05 EST
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 6:36 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 06:57:49AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
>> > By using regmap_irq_update_bits to ACK the interrupts we use the masked
>> > status bits so we take care not to affect any other bits then use
>> > ack_invert to determine if we clear or set those bits.
>
>> This change to use regmap_irq_update_bits() now breaks things for
>> me with cpcap interrupts. So it seems to cause a non-inverted mode
>> regression. There should be no need to read the ack register, I
>> gues that's the whole idea of having a separate ack register :)
>
> Yes, that'd be my expectation as well - the register should be just
> write only. regmap_update_bits() definitely isn't the right thing here
> since it will suppress the write part of the read/modify/write cycle if
> it detects that it didn't actually modify anything as an optimization.
understood. I will put together a v3 soon.
Thanks,
Tim