Re: [PATCH 06/12] staging: iio: tsl2x7x: correctly return errors in tsl2x7x_get_prox()

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sat Mar 10 2018 - 09:42:38 EST


On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 20:49:36 -0500
Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Not all errors that occurred in tsl2x7x_get_prox() were correctly
> reported in the return value. This patch changes the error handling
> so that errors are now returned properly.
>
> Note that the ret variable is from the call to tsl2x7x_read_status(),
> and it already has the correct error check. The -EINVAL error code is
> for an unexpected value in the register.
>
> This patch also corrects an unnecessary word wrap in the call to
> le16_to_cpup() while changes are being made to this code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Good cleanup.

Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to work their magic.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> index 5c611250127f..cc209b64ed5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> @@ -489,16 +489,20 @@ static int tsl2x7x_get_prox(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> case tmd2671:
> case tsl2771:
> case tmd2771:
> - if (!(ret & TSL2X7X_STA_ADC_VALID))
> + if (!(ret & TSL2X7X_STA_ADC_VALID)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> goto prox_poll_err;
> + }
> break;
> case tsl2572:
> case tsl2672:
> case tmd2672:
> case tsl2772:
> case tmd2772:
> - if (!(ret & TSL2X7X_STA_PRX_VALID))
> + if (!(ret & TSL2X7X_STA_PRX_VALID)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> goto prox_poll_err;
> + }
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -512,14 +516,13 @@ static int tsl2x7x_get_prox(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> chdata[i] = ret;
> }
>
> - chip->prox_data =
> - le16_to_cpup((const __le16 *)&chdata[0]);
> + chip->prox_data = le16_to_cpup((const __le16 *)&chdata[0]);
> + ret = chip->prox_data;
>
> prox_poll_err:
> -
> mutex_unlock(&chip->prox_mutex);
>
> - return chip->prox_data;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /**