Re: [PATCH v4.16-rc4 1/2] x86/vdso: on Intel, VDSO should handle CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Mar 12 2018 - 05:28:36 EST

Next message: tip-bot for Kirill A. Shutemov: "[tip:x86/mm] x86/boot/compressed/64: Describe the logic behind the LA57 check"
Previous message: Ard Biesheuvel: "Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/efi: Replace efi_pgd with efi_mm.pgd"
In reply to: Jason Vas Dias: "[PATCH v4.16-rc4 1/2] x86/vdso: on Intel, VDSO should handle CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

* Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Currently the VDSO does not handle

NAK, because you have apparently ignored my mails and have again sent patches in
violation of established patch sending procedures outlined in
process/submitting-patches.rst.

Thanks,

Ingo

Next message: tip-bot for Kirill A. Shutemov: "[tip:x86/mm] x86/boot/compressed/64: Describe the logic behind the LA57 check"
Previous message: Ard Biesheuvel: "Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/efi: Replace efi_pgd with efi_mm.pgd"
In reply to: Jason Vas Dias: "[PATCH v4.16-rc4 1/2] x86/vdso: on Intel, VDSO should handle CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]