Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: tegra: Mark HCLK, SCLK and EMC as critical

[Dmitry Osipenko]

On 12.03.2018 10:15, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 05:35:46PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 08.03.2018 17:44, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:33:29PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> On 15.01.2018 13:56, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> On 10.01.2018 16:59, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>> Machine dies if HCLK, SCLK or EMC is disabled. Hence mark these clocks
>>>>>> as critical.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Change log:
>>>>>> v2:     Fixed accidentally missed marking EMC as critical on Tegra30 and
>>>>>>         Tegra124. Switched to a use of common EMC gate definition on Tegra20
>>>>>>         and Tegra30.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v3:     Dropped marking PLL_P outputs as critical, because seems they are
>>>>>>         not so critical. Although, I still haven't got a definitive answer
>>>>>>         about what exact HW functions are affected by the fixed-clocks.
>>>>>>         Anyway it should be cleaner to correct the actual drivers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stephen / Michael, would it be possible to schedule these patches for 4.16? My
>>>>> T20 and T30 devices aren't working without the 'critical clocks' patch. Things
>>>>> happen to work with the opensource u-boot, but not with the proprietary
>>>>> bootloader. It's probably not a big deal that out-of-tree devices are broken,
>>>>> although would be nice to have one problem less.
>>>>
>>>> Guys, is there anything I could do to get these patches in linux-next?
>>>
>>> I've picked these up into the for-4.17/clk branch in the Tegra tree. I
>>> already have that branch for the MBIST patches which are a dependency
>>> for the for-4.17/soc branch.
>>
>> Thank you very much! Could you please add stable tag to this ("Mark HCLK, SCLK
>> and EMC as critical") patch? It would be nice to have 4.16 unbroken eventually
>> for those who (have to) use downstream android bootloader.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.16
> 
> Should we add a Fixes: line instead? That way it will get automatically
> backported to all applicable stable releases.
> 
> This is a little complicated because the clocks were introduced in
> different commits, most of them a very long time ago:
> 
> 	a7c8485a0ebbdce303c6709e208bb4fd08aff8ad (sclk)
> 	2db04f16b589c6c96bd07df3f1ef8558bfdb6810 (emc)
> 	76ebc134d45d7e6e1dc29fdcef4e539c5bc76eb8 (emc)
> 	...
> 
> So Fixes: is perhaps not desirable after all, but then, so isn't tagging
> v4.16 specifically because this is a bug since almost forever, so v4.16
> is fairly arbitrary. Shouldn't we at least get this fixed for the last
> couple of LTS releases?

That issue was masked in earlier kernels and only appears in 4.16, there is no
need to backport it further. I thought that adding of 'stable' tag is enough to
get patch backported automatically, so let's add 'fixes' instead:

Fixes: 109eba2eb61a ("clk: tegra: Mark APB clock as critical")

This patch applies cleanly to 4.16, everything should be fine.