Re: [PATCH v5 18/36] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Reset aux channel if an error occurred

[Archit Taneja]

On Saturday 10 March 2018 03:53 AM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Lin Huang <hl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> AUX errors are caused by many different reasons. We may not know what
> happened in aux channel on failure, so let's reset aux channel if some
> errors occurred.
>
> Cc: åå ç <wzz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> index dee1ba109b5f..7b7fd227e1f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> @@ -466,6 +466,10 @@ void analogix_dp_init_aux(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
>   	reg = RPLY_RECEIV | AUX_ERR;
>   	writel(reg, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_INT_STA);
>   
> +	analogix_dp_set_analog_power_down(dp, AUX_BLOCK, true);
> +	usleep_range(10, 11);
> +	analogix_dp_set_analog_power_down(dp, AUX_BLOCK, false);
> +

Is this additional power on/off the analog power to the AUX block
required to reset it correctly? If so, could you mention that in the
commit message?

>   	analogix_dp_reset_aux(dp);
>   
>   	/* Disable AUX transaction H/W retry */
> @@ -1159,7 +1163,7 @@ ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>   				 reg, !(reg & AUX_EN), 25, 500 * 1000);
>   	if (ret) {
>   		dev_err(dp->dev, "AUX CH enable timeout!\n");
> -		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		goto aux_error;
>   	}
>   
>   	/* TODO: Wait for an interrupt instead of looping? */
> @@ -1168,7 +1172,7 @@ ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>   				 reg, reg & RPLY_RECEIV, 10, 20 * 1000);
>   	if (ret) {
>   		dev_err(dp->dev, "AUX CH cmd reply timeout!\n");
> -		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		goto aux_error;
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Clear interrupt source for AUX CH command reply */
> @@ -1178,7 +1182,7 @@ ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>   	reg = readl(dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_INT_STA);
>   	if (reg & AUX_ERR) {
>   		writel(AUX_ERR, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_INT_STA);
> -		return -EREMOTEIO;
> +		goto aux_error;
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Check AUX CH error access status */
> @@ -1186,7 +1190,7 @@ ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>   	if ((reg & AUX_STATUS_MASK)) {
>   		dev_err(dp->dev, "AUX CH error happened: %d\n\n",
>   			reg & AUX_STATUS_MASK);
> -		return -EREMOTEIO;
> +		goto aux_error;
>   	}
>   
>   	if (msg->request & DP_AUX_I2C_READ) {
> @@ -1212,4 +1216,10 @@ ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>   		msg->reply = DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_ACK;
>   
>   	return num_transferred > 0 ? num_transferred : -EBUSY;
> +
> +aux_error:
> +	/* if aux err happen, reset aux */
> +	analogix_dp_init_aux(dp);
> +
> +	return -EREMOTEIO;

A couple of ETIMEDOUTs have been replaced with EREMOTEIOs after this
change. Maybe we set it the error no in ret and return ret?

With those changes,

Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Archit

>   }