RE: [RFT][PATCH v7 3/8] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop

From: Doug Smythies
Date: Tue Mar 20 2018 - 13:52:26 EST

Next message: Cong Wang: "Re: xfs: list corruption in xfs_setup_inode()"
Previous message: Palmer Dabbelt: "Re: [tip:irq/core 12/13] drivers/irqchip/irq-vic.c:295:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_handle_irq'; did you mean 'vic_handle_irq'?"
In reply to: Rafael J. Wysocki: "[RFT][PATCH v7 7/8] cpuidle: menu: Refine idle state selection for running tick"
Next in thread: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [RFT][PATCH v7 3/8] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I am just trying to catch up. Switching to 4.16-rc6 and
this new patch set.

I think this patch 3/8 is incorrect, and is actually
patch 2/8 repeated.

I'll see if I can just apply the old v5 patch 3/7,
and move on.

On 2018.03.20 08:16 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

...[snip]...

Next message: Cong Wang: "Re: xfs: list corruption in xfs_setup_inode()"
Previous message: Palmer Dabbelt: "Re: [tip:irq/core 12/13] drivers/irqchip/irq-vic.c:295:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_handle_irq'; did you mean 'vic_handle_irq'?"
In reply to: Rafael J. Wysocki: "[RFT][PATCH v7 7/8] cpuidle: menu: Refine idle state selection for running tick"
Next in thread: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [RFT][PATCH v7 3/8] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]