Re: [PATCH 00/21] eeprom: at24: driver refactoring

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2018-03-19 15:43 GMT+01:00 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> This series contains what I hope to be a non-controversial refactoring
>>> of the at24 eeprom driver.
>>>
>>> Most changes revolve around at24_probe() which became quite complicated
>>> and hard to read.
>>>
>>> The only functional changes are: disabling the internal locking
>>> mechanisms of regmap (since we already take care of that in the driver)
>>> and removing an if checking if byte_len is a power of 2 (as we do
>>> support models for which it's not true).
>>>
>>> All other patches affect readability and code structure.
>>>
>>> Tested with a couple models and different both for device tree and
>>> platform data modes.
>>
>> Is there any available tree with that series applied?
>> I would test it on Intel Galileo Gen 2 which has ACPI enumerated AT24
>> EEPROM attached.
>>
>
> Yes, it's in my github tree:
>
>     https://github.com/brgl/linux    topic/at24/refactoring
>
> Thanks in advance for testing it!

At least this didn't break AT24 on Intel Galileo Gen 2 board in ACPI mode.

Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko