Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c: pca-platform: additional improvements

[Wolfram Sang]

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 03:39:47AM +0000, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 07/12/17 23:42, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 06:29:18PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 10:13:54PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> >>> This series addresses some of the points identified by Andy. The series is
> >>> based on top of i2c/for-next. 2 of the patches from v1 have already been
> >>> applied so I've dropped them from this version.
> >>>
> >>> I have compile tested patch 1/1 but I don't have access to sh hardware
> >>> to actually test the changes on.
> >>>
> >>> Chris Packham (4):
> >>>    sh: sh7785lcr: add GPIO lookup table for i2c controller reset
> >>>    i2c: pca-platform: unconditionally use devm_gpiod_get_optional
> >>>    i2c: pca-platform: use device_property_read_u32
> >>>    i2c: pca-platform: drop gpio from platform data
> >>>
> >>>   arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/boards/acvilon.c |  1 -
> >>>   arch/sh/boards/board-sh7785lcr.c          | 11 +++++++++-
> >>>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c     | 34 +++++++++----------------------
> >>>   include/linux/i2c-pca-platform.h          |  3 ---
> >>>   4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Series looks good to me, too. I'd need ACKs from the SH maintainers,
> >> though. Technically, from Blackfin maintainers as well. But I haven't
> >> heard from them in months, so I could go without that.
> > 
> > Adding Rich Felker to CC...
> > 
> 
> Ping. Was there any movement on this series? I think this may have been 
> caught up between the holiday period and various merge windows.
> 
> Just wanted to check if there was anything I need to be doing to get 
> this through.

No, there wasn't. I was waiting for ACKs from the maintainers, but
checking the arch/sh/-git-history, the last action I see from them is
~18 months ago. So, I'll pick up your patches without those acks...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature