Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

[éåæ]

Hi, Tony and Fabio,

Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken.

Huacai
 
------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "Andrew Morton"<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Date:  Sat, Mar 24, 2018 03:15 AM
To:  "Fabio Estevam"<festevam@xxxxxxxxx>;
Cc:  "Tony Lindgren"<tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "Huacai Chen"<chenhc@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Stephen Rothwell"<sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Rich Felker"<dalias@xxxxxxxx>; "Russell King"<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Yoshinori Sato"<ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "linux-kernel"<linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Ralf Baechle"<ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "linux-omap"<linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "James Hogan"<james.hogan@xxxxxxxx>; "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"<linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Subject:  Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector
 
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:45:27 -0300 Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in
> > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm.
> 
> Yes, almost all imx are broken in linux-next due to this commit:
> https://kernelci.org/soc/imx/job/next/kernel/next-20180323/

Thanks, I dropped it and I expect Stephen will also do that.