Re: [PATCH] genirq: Pass desc to __irq_free instead of irq number

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Mon Mar 26 2018 - 11:49:35 EST


On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:43:27AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> You still claim there is only one instance, I assume that's because the branch
> that is pulled into next (tip/auto-latest) is autogenerated and contains some
> cruft?

The branch is autogenerated and reset on top of Linus head on a regular
base and that's what I looked at. It does not contain any cruft at all. It
contains a single instance of that patch, i.e. 83ac4ca943af

The irq/core branch was rebased once and the commit in question was
cherry-picked so it ended up with a different sha1. It probably was in next
with the old sha1 for a day or two, but it's definitely not in
tip/auto-latest.

Thanks,

tglx