Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] remoteproc: da8xx: prepare and unprepare the clock where needed

From: Suman Anna
Date: Mon Mar 26 2018 - 17:21:04 EST


On 03/23/2018 08:04 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We're currently switching the platform to using the common clock
> framework. We need to explicitly prepare and unprepare the rproc
> clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

FWIW, I have been able to use this patch even without the CCF adaptation
as clk_prepare()/clk_unprepare() are stubs returning 0, and the
effective code would be same as before. Prefer "remoteproc/davinci: ..."
on the patch subject as was being done previously.

With that,
Acked-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>

regards
Suman

> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> index 2b24291337b7..f134192922e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> @@ -149,9 +149,9 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>
> writel(rproc->bootaddr, drproc->bootreg);
>
> - ret = clk_enable(dsp_clk);
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(dsp_clk);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "clk_enable() failed: %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "clk_prepare_enable() failed: %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = rproc->priv;
>
> davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk);
> - clk_disable(drproc->dsp_clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(drproc->dsp_clk);
>
> return 0;
> }
>