Re: [PATCH net] vhost: correctly remove wait queue during poll failure

From: Jason Wang
Date: Tue Mar 27 2018 - 05:43:29 EST




On 2018å03æ27æ 17:28, Darren Kenny wrote:
Hi Jason,

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:47:22AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We tried to remove vq poll from wait queue, but do not check whether
or not it was in a list before. This will lead double free. Fixing
this by checking poll->wqh to make sure it was in a list.

This text seems at odds with the code below, instead of checking
poll-whq, you are removing that check...

Maybe the text needs rewording?

Yes, I admit it's bad, thanks for pointing out.

How about:

"Fixing this by switching to use vhost_poll_stop() which zeros poll->wqh after removing poll from waitqueue to make sure it won't be freed twice."

Thanks


Thanks,

Darren.


Reported-by: syzbot+c0272972b01b872e604a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 2b8b328b61c79 ("vhost_net: handle polling errors when setting backend")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 1b3e8d2d..5d5a9d9 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -212,8 +212,7 @@ int vhost_poll_start(struct vhost_poll *poll, struct file *file)
ÂÂÂÂif (mask)
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ vhost_poll_wakeup(&poll->wait, 0, 0, poll_to_key(mask));
ÂÂÂÂif (mask & EPOLLERR) {
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ if (poll->wqh)
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ remove_wait_queue(poll->wqh, &poll->wait);
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ vhost_poll_stop(poll);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ret = -EINVAL;
ÂÂÂÂ}

--
2.7.4