[PATCH 4.14 079/101] selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall: Fix for yet more glibc interference
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Mar 27 2018 - 13:24:04 EST
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 4b0b37d4cc54b21a6ecad7271cbc850555869c62 upstream.
glibc keeps getting cleverer, and my version now turns raise() into
more than one syscall. Since the test relies on ptrace seeing an
exact set of syscalls, this breaks the test. Replace raise(SIGSTOP)
with syscall(SYS_tgkill, ...) to force glibc to get out of our way.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bc80338b453afa187bc5f895bd8e2c8d6e264da2.1521300271.git.luto@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall.c
@@ -183,8 +183,10 @@ static void test_ptrace_syscall_restart(
if (ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, 0, 0) != 0)
err(1, "PTRACE_TRACEME");
+ pid_t pid = getpid(), tid = syscall(SYS_gettid);
+
printf("\tChild will make one syscall\n");
- raise(SIGSTOP);
+ syscall(SYS_tgkill, pid, tid, SIGSTOP);
syscall(SYS_gettid, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15);
_exit(0);
@@ -301,9 +303,11 @@ static void test_restart_under_ptrace(vo
if (ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, 0, 0) != 0)
err(1, "PTRACE_TRACEME");
+ pid_t pid = getpid(), tid = syscall(SYS_gettid);
+
printf("\tChild will take a nap until signaled\n");
setsigign(SIGUSR1, SA_RESTART);
- raise(SIGSTOP);
+ syscall(SYS_tgkill, pid, tid, SIGSTOP);
syscall(SYS_pause, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
_exit(0);