INFO: rcu detected stall in commit_echoes
From: syzbot
Date: Wed Mar 28 2018 - 03:11:37 EST
Hello,
syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
3eb2ce825ea1ad89d20f7a3b5780df850e4be274 (Sun Mar 25 22:44:30 2018 +0000)
Linux 4.16-rc7
syzbot dashboard link:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a0366f667e2cac7c0bbf
So far this crash happened 3 times on upstream.
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
Raw console output:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?id=6443860423081984
Kernel config:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?id=-8440362230543204781
compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620
IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+a0366f667e2cac7c0bbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It will help syzbot understand when the bug is fixed. See footer for
details.
If you forward the report, please keep this part and the footer.
INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
0-....: (124999 ticks this GP) idle=692/1/4611686018427387906
softirq=21889/21889 fqs=31226
(t=125000 jiffies g=11261 c=11260 q=580)
NMI backtrace for cpu 0
CPU: 0 PID: 215 Comm: kworker/u4:4 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc7+ #3
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 01/01/2011
Workqueue: events_unbound flush_to_ldisc
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
dump_stack+0x194/0x24d lib/dump_stack.c:53
nmi_cpu_backtrace+0x1d2/0x210 lib/nmi_backtrace.c:103
nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x123/0x180 lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62
arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c:38
trigger_single_cpu_backtrace include/linux/nmi.h:156 [inline]
rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x186/0x1de kernel/rcu/tree.c:1375
print_cpu_stall kernel/rcu/tree.c:1524 [inline]
check_cpu_stall.isra.61+0xbb8/0x15b0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1592
__rcu_pending kernel/rcu/tree.c:3361 [inline]
rcu_pending kernel/rcu/tree.c:3423 [inline]
rcu_check_callbacks+0x238/0xd20 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2763
update_process_times+0x30/0x60 kernel/time/timer.c:1636
tick_sched_handle+0x85/0x160 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:162
tick_sched_timer+0x42/0x120 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1194
__run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1349 [inline]
__hrtimer_run_queues+0x39c/0xec0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1411
hrtimer_interrupt+0x2a5/0x6f0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1469
local_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1025 [inline]
smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x14a/0x700 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1050
apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:857
</IRQ>
RIP: 0010:__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x0/0x50
RSP: 0018:ffff8801d93e7070 EFLAGS: 00000217 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff12
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc90007f8a000 RCX: ffffffff82f38392
RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 1ffff1003b278d6c RDI: ffffc90007f8bb1f
RBP: ffff8801d93e70e0 R08: 1ffff1003b27cdb5 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000577d218be
R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 00000000000008bf R15: 0000000000001ed0
commit_echoes+0x147/0x1b0 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:764
n_tty_receive_char_fast drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1416 [inline]
n_tty_receive_buf_fast drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1576 [inline]
__receive_buf drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1611 [inline]
n_tty_receive_buf_common+0x1156/0x2520 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1709
n_tty_receive_buf2+0x33/0x40 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:1744
tty_ldisc_receive_buf+0xa7/0x180 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:456
tty_port_default_receive_buf+0x106/0x160 drivers/tty/tty_port.c:38
receive_buf drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:475 [inline]
flush_to_ldisc+0x3c4/0x590 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:524
process_one_work+0xc47/0x1bb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2113
worker_thread+0x223/0x1990 kernel/workqueue.c:2247
kthread+0x33c/0x400 kernel/kthread.c:238
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:406
---
This bug is generated by a dumb bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for details.
Direct all questions to syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
syzbot will keep track of this bug report.
If you forgot to add the Reported-by tag, once the fix for this bug is
merged
into any tree, please reply to this email with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
To mark this as a duplicate of another syzbot report, please reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If it's a one-off invalid bug report, please reply with:
#syz invalid
Note: if the crash happens again, it will cause creation of a new bug
report.
Note: all commands must start from beginning of the line in the email body.