Re: [PATCH 1/2] target: drop spin_lock_assert() + irqs_disabled() combo checks

[bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On 2018-03-28 15:05:41 [+0000], Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The names of the two functions touched by patch 1/2 start with a double
> underscore. That by itself is already a hint that these should be called with
> a lock held (I know that this is not a universal convention in the Linux
> kernel). I'm fine either way - either with patch 1/2 as posted or patch 1/2
> with the above comment added.

Okay. In that case let me update 1/2.
But 2/2 with the comment as Steven suggested is still a no no for you?

> Bart.

Sebastian