Re: [PATCH 1/1] hugetlbfs: fix bug in pgoff overflow checking

From: kbuild test robot
Date: Thu Mar 29 2018 - 12:01:22 EST


Hi Mike,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.16-rc7 next-20180329]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mike-Kravetz/hugetlbfs-fix-bug-in-pgoff-overflow-checking/20180329-231724
config: i386-randconfig-x000-201812 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c: In function 'hugetlbfs_file_mmap':
>> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:119:35: warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
(((1UL << (PAGE_SHIFT + 1)) - 1) << \
^
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:144:38: note: in expansion of macro 'PGOFF_LOFFT_MAX'
if ((loff_t)vma->vm_pgoff & (loff_t)PGOFF_LOFFT_MAX)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

vim +119 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c

110
111 /*
112 * Mask used when checking the page offset value passed in via system
113 * calls. This value will be converted to a loff_t which is signed.
114 * Therefore, we want to check the upper PAGE_SHIFT + 1 bits of the
115 * value. The extra bit (- 1 in the shift value) is to take the sign
116 * bit into account.
117 */
118 #define PGOFF_LOFFT_MAX \
> 119 (((1UL << (PAGE_SHIFT + 1)) - 1) << \
120 ((sizeof(loff_t) * BITS_PER_BYTE) - (PAGE_SHIFT + 1)))
121

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: application/gzip