Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] perf/core: store context switch out type into Perf trace
From: Alexey Budankov
Date: Thu Mar 29 2018 - 14:37:49 EST
Hi,
On 29.03.2018 18:43, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 06:02:48PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> index 912b85b52344..cd6ad7e13824 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -655,6 +655,10 @@ struct perf_event_mmap_page {
>> * perf_event_attr::precise_ip.
>> */
>> #define PERF_RECORD_MISC_EXACT_IP (1 << 14)
>> +/*
>> + * Indicates that thread was preempted in TASK_RUNNING state
>> + */
>> +#define PERF_RECORD_MISC_SWITCH_OUT_PREEMPT (1 << 14)
>> /*
>> * Reserve the last bit to indicate some extended misc field
>> */
>
> Could you please add a description (in the header) describing why it's safe to
> reuse this bit? i.e. describe which events these are valid for, so it's clear
> they don't overlap.
It is currently employed only on x86 architecture when reporting precise events
samples with exact bit set in pt_regs->flags. Apparently there is no conflict on
this bit among different trace records so the message could be like this:
/*
* These PERF_RECORD_MISC_* flags are safely reused for the following events:
*
* PERF_RECORD_MISC_PRECISE_IP - PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE of precise events
* PERF_RECORD_MISC_SWITCH_OUT_PREEMPT - PERF_RECORD_SWITCH* events
*/
Thanks,
Alexey
>
> For bit 13 we have:
>
> /*
> * Following PERF_RECORD_MISC_* are used on different
> * events, so can reuse the same bit position:
> *
> * PERF_RECORD_MISC_MMAP_DATA - PERF_RECORD_MMAP* events
> * PERF_RECORD_MISC_COMM_EXEC - PERF_RECORD_COMM event
> * PERF_RECORD_MISC_SWITCH_OUT - PERF_RECORD_SWITCH* events
> */
> #define PERF_RECORD_MISC_MMAP_DATA (1 << 13)
> #define PERF_RECORD_MISC_COMM_EXEC (1 << 13)
> #define PERF_RECORD_MISC_SWITCH_OUT (1 << 13)
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>