Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] fs/crashdd: add API to collect hardware dump in second kernel

[Rahul Lakkireddy]

On Friday, March 03/30/18, 2018 at 16:09:07 +0530, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:56:33AM CET, rahul.lakkireddy@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >Add a new module crashdd that exports the /sys/kernel/crashdd/
> >directory in second kernel, containing collected hardware/firmware
> >dumps.
> >
> >The sequence of actions done by device drivers to append their device
> >specific hardware/firmware logs to /sys/kernel/crashdd/ directory are
> >as follows:
> >
> >1. During probe (before hardware is initialized), device drivers
> >register to the crashdd module (via crashdd_add_dump()), with
> >callback function, along with buffer size and log name needed for
> >firmware/hardware log collection.
> >
> >2. Crashdd creates a driver's directory under
> >/sys/kernel/crashdd/<driver>. Then, it allocates the buffer with
> 
> This smells. I need to identify the exact ASIC instance that produced
> the dump. To identify by driver name does not help me if I have multiple
> instances of the same driver. This looks wrong to me. This looks like
> a job for devlink where you have 1 devlink instance per 1 ASIC instance.
> 
> Please see:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=36524
> 
> I bevieve that the solution in the patchset could be used for
> your usecase too.
> 
> 

The sysfs approach proposed here had been dropped in favour exporting
the dumps as ELF notes in /proc/vmcore.

Will be posting the new patches soon.

> >requested size and invokes the device driver's registered callback
> >function.
> >
> >3. Device driver collects all hardware/firmware logs into the buffer
> >and returns control back to crashdd.
> >
> >4. Crashdd exposes the buffer as a binary file via
> >/sys/kernel/crashdd/<driver>/<dump_file>.
> >