Re: [PATCH 00/11] Use global pages with PTI

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > No Global pages (baseline): 186.951 seconds time elapsed  ( +-  0.35% )
> > 28 Global pages (this set): 185.756 seconds time elapsed  ( +-  0.09% )
> >                              -1.195 seconds (-0.64%)
> > 
> > Lower is better here, obviously.
> > 
> > I also re-checked everything using will-it-scale's llseek1 test[2] which
> > is basically a microbenchmark of a halfway reasonable syscall.  Higher
> > here is better.
> > 
> > No Global pages (baseline): 15783951 lseeks/sec
> > 28 Global pages (this set): 16054688 lseeks/sec
> > 			     +270737 lseeks/sec (+1.71%)
> > 
> > So, both the kernel compile and the microbenchmark got measurably faster.
> 
> Ok, cool, this is much better!
> 
> Mind re-sending the patch-set against latest -tip so it can be merged?
> 
> At this point !PCID Intel hardware is not a primary concern, if something bad 
> happens on them with global pages we can quirk global pages off on them in some 
> way, or so.

BTW., the expectation on !PCID Intel hardware would be for global pages to help 
even more than the 0.6% and 1.7% you measured on PCID hardware: PCID already 
_reduces_ the cost of TLB flushes - so if there's not even PCID then global pages 
should help even more.

In theory at least. Would still be nice to measure it.

Thanks,

	Ingo