WARNING: ODEBUG bug in hfsplus_fill_super

From: syzbot
Date: Sat Mar 31 2018 - 16:49:41 EST

Next message: syzbot: "KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in find_first_zero_bit"
Previous message: syzbot: "WARNING in format_decode"
In reply to: syzbot: "WARNING: ODEBUG bug in hfsplus_fill_super"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
9dd2326890d89a5179967c947dab2bab34d7ddee (Fri Mar 30 17:29:47 2018 +0000)
Merge tag 'ceph-for-4.16-rc8' of git://github.com/ceph/ceph-client
syzbot dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4f2e5f086147d543ab03

C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?id=5787167037063168
syzkaller reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?id=5103671176069120
Raw console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?id=6295681903886336
Kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?id=-2760467897697295172
compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620

IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+4f2e5f086147d543ab03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It will help syzbot understand when the bug is fixed. See footer for details.
If you forward the report, please keep this part and the footer.

hfsplus: found bad thread record in catalog
hfsplus: failed to load root directory
hfsplus: failed to load root directory
------------[ cut here ]------------
ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x90 kernel/workqueue.c:1355
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5536 at lib/debugobjects.c:291 debug_print_object+0x166/0x220 lib/debugobjects.c:288
Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...

CPU: 1 PID: 5536 Comm: syzkaller048155 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc7+ #7
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
dump_stack+0x194/0x24d lib/dump_stack.c:53
panic+0x1e4/0x41c kernel/panic.c:183
__warn+0x1dc/0x200 kernel/panic.c:547
report_bug+0x1f4/0x2b0 lib/bug.c:186
fixup_bug.part.10+0x37/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:178
fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:247 [inline]
do_error_trap+0x2d7/0x3e0 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:296
do_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:315
invalid_op+0x1b/0x40 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:986
RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x166/0x220 lib/debugobjects.c:288
RSP: 0018:ffff8801acbf73d0 EFLAGS: 00010082
RAX: dffffc0000000008 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: ffffffff815b193e
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 1ffff1003597ee2a RDI: 1ffff1003597edff
RBP: ffff8801acbf7410 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 1ffff1003597edd1
R10: ffffed003597eea9 R11: ffffffff88583158 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: ffffffff885949e0 R14: ffffffff8775c040 R15: ffffffff81604110
__debug_check_no_obj_freed lib/debugobjects.c:745 [inline]
debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x662/0xf1f lib/debugobjects.c:774
kfree+0xc7/0x260 mm/slab.c:3800
hfsplus_fill_super+0x114b/0x2030 fs/hfsplus/super.c:609
mount_bdev+0x2b7/0x370 fs/super.c:1119
hfsplus_mount+0x34/0x40 fs/hfsplus/super.c:645
mount_fs+0x66/0x2d0 fs/super.c:1222
vfs_kern_mount.part.26+0xc6/0x4a0 fs/namespace.c:1037
vfs_kern_mount fs/namespace.c:2509 [inline]
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2512 [inline]
do_mount+0xea4/0x2bb0 fs/namespace.c:2842
SYSC_mount fs/namespace.c:3058 [inline]
SyS_mount+0xab/0x120 fs/namespace.c:3035
do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
RIP: 0033:0x44a51a
RSP: 002b:00007f40bbaadd38 EFLAGS: 00000297 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000200003a8 RCX: 000000000044a51a
RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000020000100 RDI: 00007f40bbaadd50
RBP: 00000000006e49c4 R08: 0000000020017900 R09: 000000000000000a
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000297 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00000000006e49c0 R15: 0073756c70736668

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.16.0-rc7+ #7 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syzkaller048155/5536 is trying to acquire lock:
((console_sem).lock){....}, at: [<00000000d4a7cd50>] down_trylock+0x13/0x70 kernel/locking/semaphore.c:136

but task is already holding lock:
(&obj_hash[i].lock){-.-.}, at: [<00000000507259e1>] __debug_check_no_obj_freed lib/debugobjects.c:736 [inline]
(&obj_hash[i].lock){-.-.}, at: [<00000000507259e1>] debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x1e9/0xf1f lib/debugobjects.c:774

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 (&obj_hash[i].lock){-.-.}:
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x96/0xc0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:152
__debug_object_init+0x109/0x1040 lib/debugobjects.c:343
debug_object_init+0x17/0x20 lib/debugobjects.c:391
debug_hrtimer_init kernel/time/hrtimer.c:410 [inline]
debug_init kernel/time/hrtimer.c:458 [inline]
hrtimer_init+0x8c/0x410 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1259
init_dl_task_timer+0x1b/0x50 kernel/sched/deadline.c:1060
__sched_fork+0x2bb/0xb60 kernel/sched/core.c:2189
init_idle+0x75/0x820 kernel/sched/core.c:5352
sched_init+0xb19/0xc43 kernel/sched/core.c:6049
start_kernel+0x452/0x819 init/main.c:586
x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:378
x86_64_start_kernel+0x77/0x7a arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:359
secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:239

-> #2 (&rq->lock){-.-.}:
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
rq_lock kernel/sched/sched.h:1760 [inline]
task_fork_fair+0x7a/0x690 kernel/sched/fair.c:9471
sched_fork+0x450/0xc10 kernel/sched/core.c:2405
copy_process.part.38+0x17c9/0x4bd0 kernel/fork.c:1763
copy_process kernel/fork.c:1606 [inline]
_do_fork+0x1f7/0xf70 kernel/fork.c:2087
kernel_thread+0x34/0x40 kernel/fork.c:2146
rest_init+0x22/0xf0 init/main.c:403
start_kernel+0x7f1/0x819 init/main.c:717
x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:378
x86_64_start_kernel+0x77/0x7a arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:359
secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:239

-> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}:
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x96/0xc0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:152
try_to_wake_up+0xbc/0x15f0 kernel/sched/core.c:1989
wake_up_process+0x10/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:2152
__up.isra.0+0x1cc/0x2c0 kernel/locking/semaphore.c:262
up+0x13b/0x1d0 kernel/locking/semaphore.c:187
__up_console_sem+0xb2/0x1a0 kernel/printk/printk.c:242
console_unlock+0x5af/0xfb0 kernel/printk/printk.c:2417
do_con_write+0x106e/0x1f70 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:2433
con_write+0x25/0xb0 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:2782
process_output_block drivers/tty/n_tty.c:579 [inline]
n_tty_write+0x5ef/0xec0 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:2308
do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:958 [inline]
tty_write+0x3fa/0x840 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1042
__vfs_write+0xef/0x970 fs/read_write.c:480
vfs_write+0x189/0x510 fs/read_write.c:544
SYSC_write fs/read_write.c:589 [inline]
SyS_write+0xef/0x220 fs/read_write.c:581
do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7

-> #0 ((console_sem).lock){....}:
lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x96/0xc0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:152
down_trylock+0x13/0x70 kernel/locking/semaphore.c:136
__down_trylock_console_sem+0xa2/0x1e0 kernel/printk/printk.c:225
console_trylock+0x15/0x70 kernel/printk/printk.c:2229
console_trylock_spinning kernel/printk/printk.c:1643 [inline]
vprintk_emit+0x5b5/0xb90 kernel/printk/printk.c:1906
vprintk_default+0x28/0x30 kernel/printk/printk.c:1947
vprintk_func+0x57/0xc0 kernel/printk/printk_safe.c:379
printk+0xaa/0xca kernel/printk/printk.c:1980
__warn_printk+0x90/0xf0 kernel/panic.c:599
debug_print_object+0x166/0x220 lib/debugobjects.c:288
__debug_check_no_obj_freed lib/debugobjects.c:745 [inline]
debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x662/0xf1f lib/debugobjects.c:774
kfree+0xc7/0x260 mm/slab.c:3800
hfsplus_fill_super+0x114b/0x2030 fs/hfsplus/super.c:609
mount_bdev+0x2b7/0x370 fs/super.c:1119
hfsplus_mount+0x34/0x40 fs/hfsplus/super.c:645
mount_fs+0x66/0x2d0 fs/super.c:1222
vfs_kern_mount.part.26+0xc6/0x4a0 fs/namespace.c:1037
vfs_kern_mount fs/namespace.c:2509 [inline]
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2512 [inline]
do_mount+0xea4/0x2bb0 fs/namespace.c:2842
SYSC_mount fs/namespace.c:3058 [inline]
SyS_mount+0xab/0x120 fs/namespace.c:3035
do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
(console_sem).lock --> &rq->lock --> &obj_hash[i].lock

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&obj_hash[i].lock);
lock(&rq->lock);
lock(&obj_hash[i].lock);
lock((console_sem).lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syzkaller048155/5536:
#0: (&type->s_umount_key#35/1){+.+.}, at: [<00000000651258d3>] alloc_super fs/super.c:211 [inline]
#0: (&type->s_umount_key#35/1){+.+.}, at: [<00000000651258d3>] sget_userns+0x3a1/0xe40 fs/super.c:502
#1: (&obj_hash[i].lock){-.-.}, at: [<00000000507259e1>] __debug_check_no_obj_freed lib/debugobjects.c:736 [inline]
#1: (&obj_hash[i].lock){-.-.}, at: [<00000000507259e1>] debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x1e9/0xf1f lib/debugobjects.c:774

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 5536 Comm: syzkaller048155 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc7+ #7
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
dump_stack+0x194/0x24d lib/dump_stack.c:53
print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x2cd/0x2dc kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1223
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1863 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1976 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2417 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x30a8/0x3e00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3431
lock_acquire+0x1d5/0x580 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x96/0xc0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:152
down_trylock+0x13/0x70 kernel/locking/semaphore.c:136
__down_trylock_console_sem+0xa2/0x1e0 kernel/printk/printk.c:225
console_trylock+0x15/0x70 kernel/printk/printk.c:2229
console_trylock_spinning kernel/printk/printk.c:1643 [inline]
vprintk_emit+0x5b5/0xb90 kernel/printk/printk.c:1906
vprintk_default+0x28/0x30 kernel/printk/printk.c:1947
vprintk_func+0x57/0xc0 kernel/printk/printk_safe.c:379
printk+0xaa/0xca kernel/printk/printk.c:1980
__warn_printk+0x90/0xf0 kernel/panic.c:599
debug_print_object+0x166/0x220 lib/debugobjects.c:288
__debug_check_no_obj_freed lib/debugobjects.c:745 [inline]
debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x662/0xf1f lib/debugobjects.c:774
kfree+0xc7/0x260 mm/slab.c:3800
hfsplus_fill_super+0x114b/0x2030 fs/hfsplus/super.c:609
mount_bdev+0x2b7/0x370 fs/super.c:1119
hfsplus_mount+0x34/0x40 fs/hfsplus/super.c:645
mount_fs+0x66/0x2d0 fs/super.c:1222
vfs_kern_mount.part.26+0xc6/0x4a0 fs/namespace.c:1037
vfs_kern_mount fs/namespace.c:2509 [inline]
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2512 [inline]
do_mount+0xea4/0x2bb0 fs/namespace.c:2842
SYSC_mount fs/namespace.c:3058 [inline]
SyS_mount+0xab/0x120 fs/namespace.c:3035
do_syscall_64+0x281/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
RIP: 0033:0x44a51a
RSP: 002b:00007f40bbaadd38 EFLAGS: 00000297 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000200003a8 RCX: 000000000044a51a
RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000020000100 RDI: 00007f40bbaadd50
RBP: 00000000006e49c4 R08: 0000000020017900 R09: 000000000000000a
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000297 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00000000006e49c0 R15: 0073756c70736668
Dumping ftrace buffer:
(ftrace buffer empty)
Kernel Offset: disabled
Rebooting in 86400 seconds..

---
This bug is generated by a dumb bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for details.
Direct all questions to syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

syzbot will keep track of this bug report.
If you forgot to add the Reported-by tag, once the fix for this bug is merged
into any tree, please reply to this email with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to test a patch for this bug, please reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch
and provide the patch inline or as an attachment.
To mark this as a duplicate of another syzbot report, please reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If it's a one-off invalid bug report, please reply with:
#syz invalid
Note: if the crash happens again, it will cause creation of a new bug report.
Note: all commands must start from beginning of the line in the email body.

Next message: syzbot: "KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in find_first_zero_bit"
Previous message: syzbot: "WARNING in format_decode"
In reply to: syzbot: "WARNING: ODEBUG bug in hfsplus_fill_super"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]