Re: [PATCH v8 03/10] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick before cpuidle_idle_call()
From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Mon Apr 02 2018 - 17:25:18 EST
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 02:02:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Make cpuidle_idle_call() decide whether or not to stop the tick.
>
> First, the cpuidle_enter_s2idle() path deals with the tick (and with
> the entire timekeeping for that matter) by itself and it doesn't need
> the tick to be stopped beforehand.
>
> Second, to address the issue with short idle duration predictions
> by the idle governor after the tick has been stopped, it will be
> necessary to change the ordering of cpuidle_select() with respect
> to tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(). To prepare for that, put a
> tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() call in the same branch in which
> cpuidle_select() is called.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Rewiewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>